|
Mammoth foundation
Harvey Canal gate project puts
contractor to the test
By Angelle Bergeron
A cofferdam constructed for the concrete foundation, support
columns and attachments for the Harvey Canal Sector gate project
in the New Orleans area was the largest and most complicated
cofferdam ever constructed by Boh Bros. Construction.
"The only thing similar to this was when we built the
footings for the Mississippi River Bridge in 1980, which had
a huge cofferdam, similar pile system and a large foundation
slab," said Vincent Saladino, project superintendent
for the New Orleans general contractor. "Instead of a
bridge superstructure, this will have flood gates." The
project will be completed next summer
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers project is the centerpiece
of the West Bank system of federal hurricane protection levees,
floodwalls and gates. The floodgates will remain open most
of the time, providing a 125-ft. horizontal clearance for
vessel traffic, but will be closed in the event of storm surge.
The 26-ft.-tall, 175-ton steel gates are nestled within the
coffer dam in the center of the canal and protrude 11.5 ft.
above water level. In the event of storm surge coming north
from the wetlands, lakes and canals toward metro New Orleans,
the gates will pivot out of their bays to meet and form a
barrier.
Boh Bros.' contract includes the foundation, construction
and installation of the gates, as well as some tie-in walls
and levee work at the location. To build the 310 ft. by 100
ft. gate foundations, Boh Bros. constructed a huge cofferdam,
excavated to minus 26 ft., drove 24-in. steel pipe piles 142
ft. deep, poured a seal slab, de-watered the dam and then
constructed the monstrous, concrete foundation that tops out
at minus 16 ft., Saladino said.
Boh divided the task into three separate cells, one for either
side of the structure and a third for a tie-in wall for a
discharge channel that is part of the system.
"We built a fender system to protect the coffer dams
and the people inside them from the barge traffic that moved
in between," Saladino said. Boh poured nearly 4,000 cu.
yds. of concrete to form the seal slab at the base of each
cell. "We had to pour the concrete in here before we
pumped the water out, or the water pressure from the outside
would blow out the sheet pile when we dewatered the coffer
dam," Saladino said.
To create the seal slab, the contractor used a pump truck
with a boom that rests on the mud bottom. A rich, seven sack
mix is pumped underwater into the mud and it balls up until
it pushes out into a layer.
"We tied crab trap floats to the hose and used it and
buoys to check the elevation as we were pouring," Saladino
said. The depth was also marked by a steel plate affixed to
a chain. "When the plate hit, we knew the concrete was
high enough," he said. "After we poured the seal,
we let it cure for about three days and then we started pumping
the water out of the coffer dam," Saladino said. "Then
you clean it up and you start doing form work and rebar."
The complete project required a number of concrete pours,
totaling >> almost 6,000 yards, but the base slab of
the structure was the most challenging. The huge slab - 8
ft. thick, 100 ft. wide and 80 ft. long - required a slow
reaction fly ash that would retard the cooling.
"The Corps was concerned about the temperature, about
differential heat and cracks in the slab, because it was such
a mass of concrete," said Mark Cheek, professional engineer
and vice president with Beta Testing and Inspection, LLC of
Gretna, La.
Cheek installed sacrificial temperature loggers at three
different depths in the slab and monitored the internal temperatures
over a 14-day period.
"The loggers have two wires coming out that look like
speaker wire," Cheek said. "I have a hand-held reader
that I plug into the wire sensor to download the data."
Using the data from each logger, Cheek was able to determine
the temperature differential between different elevations
at different phases of curing.
"The temperature differential wasn't great at all, which
means the mix performed better than they expected," he
said.
To ensure the quality of the mix and meet Corps specifications,
concrete supplier Carlo Ditta Inc. of Harvey, La., had to
designate a large portion of the company's ready mix operation
to the project.
"We had to dedicate silos for the fly ash and aggregate,
which we couldn't find locally, so we could supply the concrete
on an as-needed basis," said Sammy Ditta, sales manager.
The class F ash was brought in from Shreveport and about 650
tons of the Kentucky limestone (size 460) occupied silo space
for a year, Ditta said.
"We had to dedicate the aggregate and F ash in the silos
where we would normally store C ash, which is more economical
and used more in New Orleans, he said. The storage arrangement
caused Carlo Ditta to run out of gravel last October when
local companies experienced a trucking and materials shortage
because of Hurricane Katrina.
But Katrina wasn't the first thing to slow down the project.
The gates were fabricated and ready for installation months
in advance, but numerous change orders for the receiving structure
resulted in delays at the outset of the project.
The Corps let the original, $40 million contract in November
2003, "but there have been so many design changes that
I'd say about 75% of the structural part was delayed."
Initially, the Corps design specifications called for a float-in
structure, which was changed to a cast structure. The Corps
changed the concrete mix design specifications.
Boh was delayed six months by another contractor performing
work in the area, Saladino said.
And as a result of Hurricane Katrina and the new 100-year
level standards, the Corps is currently working on more design
changes.
As the gates were being placed in the cofferdam Aug. 3-4,
the Corps began exploring options for increasing protection
at the Harvey Canal to provide the current standard for protection.
"When the project was designed, the authorized height
was 9.5 ft., so this was more than sufficient," said
Jackie Purrington, Corps project manager. According to the
new standards, the gate is 4 ft. short, she said.
"We're looking at what we can do to remedy that."
|